Which dishes earn their place on the menu — and exactly what to do about the ones that don’t.
Costing tells you what a dish makes. Menu engineering tells you what to do about it. Plot every item on two axes — how popular it is, and how much contribution margin it earns — and the menu sorts itself into four groups, each with a different answer.
.xlsx — 40 dishes, automatic classification, colour-coded
⬇ Download free — no email
| Type | Meaning | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Star | High profit, high popularity | Protect it. Keep quality and portion absolutely consistent, hold its place on the menu, never discount it. |
| Plowhorse | Low profit, high popularity | People love it and it barely pays. Cut plate cost before you touch the price — portion, garnish, a cheaper cut — or raise the price in small steps and watch covers. |
| Puzzle | High profit, low popularity | It earns well when it sells. Move it to a better spot, rename or describe it better, train staff to recommend it. If it still won’t move, retire it. |
| Dog | Low profit, low popularity | Cut it — unless it serves a purpose the numbers can’t see, like a dietary requirement or an ingredient another dish depends on. |
An item counts as “popular” if its share of covers reaches 70% of an equal share. With five dishes an equal share is 20%, so the line sits at 14% — not 20%. Plenty of free templates simply test against the average instead. It looks like a reasonable simplification. It isn’t.
Here is what that shortcut costs you. In the example inside the file, the ribeye sells 19.8% of covers and earns $22.40 a plate.
Under the proper rule it clears the 14% line and is a Star — protect it, don’t discount it, don’t touch it.
Under “above average” it misses the 20% line and looks like a Puzzle — and the standard advice for a Puzzle is to reposition or retire it.
Same dish, same numbers, opposite instructions. That is how a menu quietly loses one of its best sellers to a rounding rule.
Why contribution margin beats food cost percentage here. A $34 duck at 32% food cost contributes $23.12 a plate. A $14 salad at 45% contributes $7.70. The salad has the worse percentage and the worse cash return — but percentages alone would have you chasing the wrong dish. Menu engineering ranks on the cash.
Long enough to be representative — a month minimum. A single busy weekend will flatter whatever was on special.
Enormously. Every classification depends on contribution margin, so a wrong plate cost puts the dish in the wrong box and you act on it. Cost the dishes properly first.
Yes — the maths is identical. Many bars find their classifications more lopsided than their kitchens.
No. It’s a file on your computer. This site has no trackers, no analytics and no cookies.
And for the business-level view, the weekly prime cost tracker — food plus labour against sales.
Start here if your costs aren’t nailed down yet: the free plate cost calculator and recipe costing spreadsheet.
This template does the classification properly, and it is free. If you would rather hand over the sales mix and the invoices and get the finished analysis back — every dish costed at true yield, contribution margin in dollars, and a list of what to reprice or cut — that is a paid service: the Menu Profitability Teardown →